Defined Approaches for Skin Sensitization (Based on OECD TG 497)

Determination of skin sensitization potential is a critical endpoint in the safety assessment of raw materials, chemicals, mixtures and formulations.  Although the Guinea Pig Maximization Test (GPMT) and Local Lymph node assay (LLNA) have historically been used to address this adverse effect, in silico and in vitro assays have been developed and validated in order to replace these resource-intensive animal tests.

In 2012, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) published the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) describing the sequence of molecular and cellular events that lead to the development of allergic contact dermatitis.  The first three “Key Events” (KEs) in the AOP which are required for Skin Sensitization are: the covalent binding of compounds to cellular proteins (KE1), activation of various pathways within skin cells (KE2) and priming of the immune system (KE3) that results in an allergic response upon repeat exposure to the substance.

Due largely in part to the complex nature of skin sensitization induction and elicitation, it has been generally accepted that no single assay can be used to fully assess this endpoint. IIVS offers multiple assays that evaluate all 3 KEs of skin sensitization initiation, including the Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA)kinetic Direct Peptide Reactivity assay (kDPRA)KeratinoSens™, and the human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT), as well as in silico QSAR analysis based on the OECD Toolbox (OECD TB) platform.

In June 2021, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) approved the Test Guideline entitled: Defined Approaches to Skin Sensitization, which include the BASF/Givaudan-developed “2 out of 3” hazard-based approach (Figure 1).

Also included in the guideline is the Kao Brands-developed Integrated Testing Strategy (ITS) Versions 1 and 2, incorporating in silico analysis of molecular structure in combination with a 2-assay in vitro evaluation of test materials. This approach provides the ability to resolve strong, weak (GHS Category 1A and 1B) and non-sensitizers. (see Figure 2).

Figure 1: Schematic of the AOP-based “2 out of 3” defined approach.  OECD TG methods for Key Events (KEs) 1, 2, or 3 are run in an undefined order until at least two of the three methods show consensus.

Figure 2: Skin Sensitization Potency Determination strategy based on OECD TG 497

Multiple strategies are also available for EPA “6-pack” submissions of biocides as well. Please refer to our Defined Approaches for EPA Testing page for further information.

Please contact IIVS for more information on individual assays or approaches to in vitro skin sensitization testing that may be suitable for your organization’s testing needs.

Related Webinars:

Watch our webinars on the KeratinoSens Assay for Identifying Skin Sensitizers and Integrated Testing Strategies for In Vitro Skin Sensitization Testing.